A 69-year old man with a clinical diagnosis of nodular hyperplasia underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. His serum PSA was 3.5 ng/ml. Ten grams of prostatic chips were removed, which were totally submitted for review. The majority of the chips revealed nodular hyperplasia. About 5% of the specimen showed areas of papillary proliferation.
The sections revealed nodular hyperplasia in the majority of the prostatic chips. However, approximately 5% of the overall specimen was involved by a complex papillary proliferation lined by pseudostratified columnar epithelium (Fig. 4.1). The papillary areas enclosed delicate fibrovascular cores (Fig. 4.2). The lining epithelial cells had abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and enlarged oval or round uniform nuclei with minimal pleomorphism Prominent nucleoli and mitotic figures were rare (Fig. 4.3).
The differential diagnostic considerations include high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) (Fig. 4.4), ductal adenocarcinoma (Fig. 4.5A, Fig. 4.5B), large gland variant of Gleason pattern 3 adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma involving the prostate (Fig. 4.6), metastases such as colonic adenocarcinoma involving the prostate, ectopic prostatic tissue (prostatic urethral polyp) (Fig. 4.7A, Fig. 4.7B), proliferative papillary urethritis, and nephrogenic metaplasia.
Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate
Key Features:
Comment:
The most challenging task is its distinction from cribriform or micropapillary forms of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Ductal adenocarcinoma contains well-formed papillary structures with fibrovascular cores. Micropapillary HGPIN shows tall columnar cells lining delicate micropapillary fronds without fibrovascular cores. Stromal fibrosis, hemosiderin deposition, and perineural invasion are features often associated with ductal adenocarcinoma; they are not seen in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Ductal adenocarcinoma often involves large areas containing numerous back-to-back glands. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia usually involves isolated or small clusters of glands; however, in a limited sample such as a needle biopsy, this distinction may be extremely difficult.
The presence of acinar differentiation allows its separation from urothelial carcinoma. In difficult cases, immunostains for PSA and PAP are useful (positive in ductal carcinoma, Fig. 4.8; negative in urothelial carcinoma). The presence of urothelial abnormalities in the adjacent urethral mucosa also favors urothelial cancer.
Benign lesions such as ectopic prostatic tissue (prostatic urethral polyp), proliferative papillary urethritis, and nephrogenic metaplasia can usually be distinguished more readily from ductal adenocarcinoma by the lack of dysplasia.
Follow-up
The patient underwent radical prostatectomy which revealed extensive involvement of the gland by cancer. Approximately 70% of the tumor had typical acinar pattern; the remaining 30% showed papillary and cribriform architecture. Such areas were seen both in the transition and the peripheral zone. The overall Gleason score was 3+4=7.