WebDox physician login
Urology case of the month
Prostate Cancer Information

The pathology of benign hyperplasia
By David G. Bostwick, M.D., M.B.A.

Introduction

Benign enlargement of the prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), nodular hyperplasia, or adenofibromyomatous hyperplasia (AFH)) consists of hyperplastic growth of the epithelium and fibromuscular tissue of the transition zone and periurethral area. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are caused by obstruction of urinary flow through the prostatic urethra and interference with muscular sphincteric function. The relationship between prostate volume and clinical symptoms has not been established; however, some studies have identified a weak correlation between the two. This chapter describes the pathologic spectrum of BPH, incuding epithelial and stromal hyperplasia as well as a wide variety of other benign proliferative lesions.

Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy
Usual epithelial and stromal hyperplasia
Oxidoreductase theory of pathogenesis
Peripheral zone BPH
Basal cell hyperplasia
Morphometry of BPH: ratio of epithelium and stroma
Pathology of BPH
Histologic variants of hyperplasia and associated benign lesions
Clinical significance of AAH
Association of BPH and prostate cancer
Sclerosing adenosis
Giant BPH (giant prostatic hyperplasia)
Androgen/aging theory of BPH pathogenesis
Atrophy and postatrophic hyperplasia (postinflammatory hyperplasia; partial atrophy; postsclerotic hyperplasia)
Immunohistochemical findings
Pathogenesis of BPH
Estrogen theory of pathogenesis
Hyperplasia of mesonephric remnants
Cribriform hyperplasia
Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis)
Atypical BCH
Role of basal cells
Verumontmum mzkcosal gland hyperplasia
Separation of AAH and cancer
Stromal hyperplasia with atypical giant cells
Inflammationl/growth factor theory of pathogenesis
Immunohistochemistry of AAH
Basal cell adenoma
Embryonic reawakening theory of pathogenesis
Basal cell hyperplasia and basal cell proliferations

Summary

BPH is one of the most common diseases in elderly men, but its etiology and pathogenesis remain uncertain. The pathologic features of BPH are well defined and heterogeneous, and include varying amounts of epithelium, smooth muscle, and fibrous stroma. The correlation of pathologic findings and clinical symptoms is weak, although recent evidence suggests that men with symptomatic BPH have a significantly higher proportion of stroma than men with asymptomatic BPH. There is also increasing evidence of a relationship between BPH and the development of prostatic carcinoma. The tissue elements in BPH may respond differently to various forms of therapy. Numerous interesting and unusual pathologic variants of BPH have been described which mimic adenocarcinoma clinically and pathologically.

References

  1. Isaacs J Brendler C B, Walsh P C. Changes in the metabolism of dihydrotestosterone in the hyperplastic human prostate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1983; 56: 139-145.
  2. Berry S J, Coffey D S, Walsh P C, Ewing L L. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol 1984; 132: 474-479.
  3. Claus S, Wrenger M, Senge T, Schulze H. Immunohistochemical determination of age related proliferation rates in normal and hyperplastic human prostates. Urol Res 1993; 21: 305-308.
  4. Walsh P C. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Walsh P C et al. (eds). Campbell's urology, 6th edn. Philadelphia: W B Saunders, 1992: 1007-1027.
  5. Bostwick D G, Cooner W H, Denis L et al. The association of benign prostatic hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate. Cancer 1992; 70: 291-301.
  6. Aoki Y, Arai Y, Maeda H et al. Racial differences in cellular composition of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate 2001; 49: 243-250.
  7. Sanda M G, Beatty T H, Stautzman RE et al. Genetic susceptibility of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1994; 151: 115-119.
  8. Partin A W, Sanda M G, Page W F et al. Concordance rates for benign prostatic disease among twins suggest hereditary influence. Urology 1994; 44: 646-650.
  9. Franks L M. Benign nodular hyperplasia of the prostate: a review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1954; 14: 92-106.
  10. McNeal J E. Origin and evolution of benign prostatic enlargement. Invest Urol 1978; 15: 340-345.
  11. McNeal J E. The pathobiology of nodular hyperplasia. In: Bostwick DG ed. Pathology of the prostate. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 3 1-36.
  12. Jacobsen S J, Girman C J, Lieber M M. Natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2001; 58 (Suppl 1): 5-16.
  13. Geller J. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: pathogenesis and medical therapy. J Am Geriatric Soc 1991; 39: 1208-1216.
  14. Djavan B, Remzi M, Erne B, Marberger M. The pathophysiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Drugs Today (Barc) 2002; 38: 867-876.
  15. Peters C A, Walsh P C. The effect of nafarelin acetate, a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist, on benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1987; 17: 599-604.
  16. Tsurusaki T, Aoki D, Kanetake H et al. Zone-dependent expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in human benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 1333-1340.
  17. Partin A W, Oesterling J E, Epstein J I et al. Influence of age and endocrine factors on the volume of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1991; 145: 405409.
  18. Gleason P E, Jones J A, Regan J S et al. Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), androgens and inflammation: possible etiologic factors in the development of prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1993; 149: 1586-1592.
  19. Eaton C L. Aetiology and pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Opin Urol 2003; 13: 7-10.
  20. Ropiquet F, Giri D, Lamb D J, Ittmann M. FGF7 and FGF2 are increased in benign prostatic hyperplasia and are associated with increased proliferation. J Urol 1999; 162: 595-599.
  21. Saez C, Gonzalez-Baena A C, Japon M A et al. Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor and its receptors FGFRl and FGFR2 in human benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with finasteride. Prostate 1999; 40: 83-88.
  22. Steiner G, Gessl A, Kramer G et al. Phenotype and function of peripheral and prostatic lymphocytes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1994; 151: 480484.
  23. Di Silverio F, Gentile V, De Matteis A et al. Distribution of inflammation, pre-malignant lesions, incidental carcinoma in histologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective analysis. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 164-175.
  24. Helpap B. Histological and immunohistochemical study of chronic prostatic inflammation with and without benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol Pathol 1994; 2: 49-59.
  25. Viglione M F: Potter S, Partin A W et al. Should the diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia be made on prostate needle biopsy? Hum Pathol 2002; 33: 796-800.
  26. Egawa S, Ohori M, Uchida T et al. Nodular hyperplasia in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland. Br J Urol 1994; 74: 520-521.
  27. Hamper U M, Sheth S, Walsh 0 C et al. Stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate: transrectal US and pathologic correlation of nonmalignant hypoechoic peripheral zone lesion. Radiology 1991; 180: 101-104.
  28. Oyen R H, Van de Voorde W M, Van Poppel H P et al. Benign hyperplastic nodules that originate in the peripheral zone of the prostate. Radiology 1993; 189: 707-711.
  29. Ohori M, Egawa S, Wheeler T M. Nodules resembling nodular hyperplasia in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland. J Urol Pathol 1994; 2: 223-233.
  30. Kawamura S, Takata K, Yoshia I, Matsui S. A case of giant prostatic hypertrophy. Hinyyyokika Kiyo 1984; 30: 1861-1866.
  31. Fishman J R, Merrill D C. A case of giant prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1993; 42: 336-337.
  32. Ockerblad N F. Giant prostate: the largest recorded. J Urol 1946; 56: 81-82.
  33. Seppelt U. Correlation among prostate stroma, plasma oestrogen levels and urinary oestrogen excretion in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1978; 47: 1230-1234.
  34. Shapiro E, Becich M J, Hartanto V et al. The relative proportion of stromal and epithelial hyperplasia is related to the development of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1992; 147: 1293-1297.
  35. Costa F: Robert M, Sarrazin B et al. Quantitative topographic distribution of epithelial and mesenchymal components in benign prostatic hypertrophy. Eur Urol 1993; 24: 120-123.
  36. Bartsch G, Muller H R, Oberholzer M, Rohr H I? Light microscopic sterological analysis of the normal human prostate and of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1979; 122: 487-491.
  37. Jardin A, Bensadoun A, Tranbaloc I? Constitution de l'adenome prostatique et profil hormonal. In: Legrain M, Chatelain C, eds. Seminaire dlUrologie. Paris: Masson, 1985: 11.
  38. Fukatsu A, Ono Y, Ito M et al. Relationship between serum prostate-specific antigen and calculated epithelial volume. Urology 2003; 61: 370-374.
  39. Chagas M A, Babinski M A, Costa W S, Sampaio F J. Stromal and acinar components of the transition zone in normal and hyperplastic human prostate. BJU Int 2002; 89: 699-702.
  40. Leav I, McNeal J E, Ho S M, Jiang Z. Alpha-methylacyl-CO-A racemase (P504S) expression in evolving carcinomas within benign prostatic hyperplasia and in cancers of the transition zone. Hum Pathol 2003; 34: 228-233.
  41. Zhang Y, Nojima S, Nakayama H et al. Characteristics of normal stromal components and their correlation with cancer occurrence in human prostate. Oncol Rep 2003; 10: 207-211.
  42. Hammarsten J, Hogstedt B. Calculated fast-growing benign prostatic hyperplasia-a risk factor for developing clinical prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2002; 36: 330-338.
  43. Banu N A, Azim F A, Kamal M et al. Inflammation and glandular proliferation in hyperplastic prostates: association with prostate specific antigen value. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2001; 27: 79-83.
  44. Eble J N, Tejada E. Cost implications of sampling strategies for prostatic transurethral resection specimens: analysis of 549 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1986; 85: 382.
  45. Murphy W M, Dean P J, Brasfield J A et al. Incidental carcinoma of the prostate. How much sampling is adequate? Am J Surg Pathol 1986; 10: 170-176.
  46. Rohr L R. Incidental adenocarcinoma in transurethral resection of the prostate. Partial versus complete microscopic examination. Am J Surg Pathol 1987; 11: 53-58.
  47. Vollmer R T. Prostate cancer and chip specimens: complete versus partial sampling. Hum Pathol 1986; 17: 285-290.
  48. Henson D E, Hutter R V Farrow G M. Practice protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with carcinoma of the prostate gland. A publication of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994; 118: 779-783.
  49. Greene DR, Wheeler TM, Egawa S et al. Relationship between clinical stage and histological zone of origin in early prostatic cancer: morphometric analysis. Br J Urol 1991; 68: 499-509.
  50. Franks L M. Atrophy and hyperplasia in prostate proper. J Pathol Bacteriol 1954; 68: 617-621.
  51. Cheville J C, Bostwick D G. Post-atrophic hyperplasia of the prostate. A histologic mimic of prostatic adenocarcinoma Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19: 1068-1076.
  52. Eble J N, Tejada E. Prostatic stromal hyperplasia with bizarre nuclei. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1991; 115: 87-89.
  53. Leong S S, Vogt P F, Yu G M. Atypical stroma with muscle hyperplasia of prostate. Urology 1988; 31: 163-167.
  54. Devaraj L T, Bostwick D G. Atypical basal cell hyperplasia of the prostate: immunophenotypic profile and proposed classification of basal cell proliferations. Am J Surg Pathol 1993; 17: 645-659.
  55. Grignon D J, Ro J Y, Ordonez N G et al. Basal cell hyperplasia, adenoid basal cell tumor, and adenoid cystic carcinoma of the prostate gland: an immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol 1988; 19: 1425-1433.
  56. Cleary K R, Choi H Y, Ayala'A G. Basal cell hyperplasia of the prostate. Am J Clin Path 1983; 80: 850-854.
  57. Dermer G B. Basal cell proliferation in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cancer 1978; 41: 1857-1862.
  58. Bonkhoff H, Stein V, Remberger K. Multidirectional differentiation in the normal, hyperplastic, and neoplastic human prostate: simultaneous demonstration of cell-specific epithelial markers. Hum Pathol 1994; 25: 42-46.
  59. Maygarden S, Strom S, Ware J L. Localization of epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemical methods in human prostatic carcinoma, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and benign hyperplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116: 269-273.
  60. Mellon K, Thompson S, Charlton R G et al. p53, c-erbB-2 and the epidermal growth factor receptor in the benign and malignant and malignant prostate. J Urol 1992; 147: 496-499.
  61. Ayala A G, Srigley J R, Ro J Y et al. Clear cell cribriform hyperplasia of prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 1986; 10: 665-672.
  62. Frauenhoffer E E, Ro J Y, El-Naggar A K et al. Clear cell cribriform hyperplasia of the prostate: immunohistochemical and flow cytometric study. Am J Clin Pathol 1991; 95: 446-453.
  63. Bostwick D G, Srigley J, Grignon D et al. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate: morphologic criteria for its distinction from well-differentiated carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1993; 24: 819-832.
  64. Bostwick D G, Algaba F, Amin M B et al. Consensus statement on terminology: recommendation to use atypical adenomatous hyperplasia in place of adenosis of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 18: 1069-1070.
  65. Bostwick D G, Qian J. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate. Relationship with carcinoma in 217 whole-mount radical prostatectomies. Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19: 506-518.
  66. Brawn P N, Speights V 0, Contin J U et al. Atypical hyperplasia in prostates of 20 to 40 year old men. J Clin Pathol 1989; 42: 383-386.
  67. Gleason D F. Atypical hyperplasia, benign hyperplasia, and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 1985; 9: 53-67.
  68. Epstein J I, Fynheer J. Acidic mucin in the prostate: can it differentiate adenosis from adenocarcinoma? Hum Pathol 1992; 23: 1321-1325.
  69. Goldstein N S, Qian J, Bostwick D G. Mucin expression in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate. Hum Pathol 1995; 26: 887-891.
  70. Epstein J I. Adenosis vs. atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 18: 1070-1071.
  71. Srigley J R. Small-acinar patterns in the prostate gland with emphasis on atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and small-acinar carcinoma. Semin Diagn Pathol 1988; 5: 254-272.
  72. Cheng L, Shan A, Cheville J C et al. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate: a premalignant lesion? Cancer Res 1998; 58: 389-391.
  73. Cunningham J M, Shan A, Wick M J et al. Allelic imbalance and microsatellite instability in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 4475-4482.
  74. Helpap B. The biological significance of atypical hyperplasia of the prostate. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1980; 387: 307-317.
  75. Renshaw AA, Santis WF, Ritchie JI? Clinicopathologic characteristics of prostatic adenocarcinoma in men with atypical prostate needle biopsies. J Urol 1998; 159: 201 8-2022.
  76. Iczkowski K A, MacLennan G T, Bostwick D G. Atypical small acinar proliferation of the prostate suspicious for malignancy in needle biopsies: histologic features and clinical significance in 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21: 1489-1495.
  77. Bostwick D G, Qian J, Frankel K. The incidence of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsies. J Urol 1995; 154: 1791-1794.
  78. Weinstein M H, Epstein J I. significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy. Hum Pathol 1993; 24: 624-629.
  79. Cheville J C, Reznicek M J, Clark J R et al. The focus of atypical glands suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsy specimens: incidence, histologic features, and clinical follow-up of cases diagnosed in a community practice. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 108: 633-640.
  80. Hoedemaeker R F, Kraanse R, Rietbergen J B et al. Evaluation of prostate needle biopsies in a populationbased screening study: the impact of borderline lesions. Cancer 1999; 85: 145-152.
  81. Orozco R, O'Dowd G, Kunnel B et al. Observations on pathology trends in 62,537 prostate biopsies obtained from urology practices in the United States. Urology 1998; 51: 186-195.
  82. Iczkowski K A, Bostwick D G. Prostate biopsy 1999: strategies and significance of pathological findings. Semin Urol Oncol 1999; 17: 177-186.
  83. Iczkowski K A, Bassler T J, Schwob V S et al. Diagnosis of 'suspicious for malignancy' in prostate biopsies: predictive value for cancer. Urology 1998; 5 1: 749-758.
  84. Chen K T K, Schiff J J. Adenomatoid prostatic tumor. Urology 1983; 21: 88-89.
  85. Collina G, Botticelli A R, Martinelli A M et al. Sclerosing adenosis of the prostate. Report of three cases with electronmicroscopy and immunohistochemical study. Histopathol 1992; 20: 505-510.
  86. Grignon D J, Ro J Y, Srigley J R et al. Sclerosing adenosis of the prostate gland. A lesion showing myoepithelial differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16: 383-391.
  87. Hulman G. 'Pseudoadenomatoid' tumor of prostate. Histopathol 1989; 14: 317-323.
  88. Jones E C, Clement P B, Young R H. Sclerosing adenosis of the prostate gland. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 11 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15: 1171-1180.
  89. Sakamoto N, Tsuneyoshi M, Enjoji M. Sclerosing adenosis of the prostate. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15: 660-667.
  90. Young R H, Clement P B. Sclerosing adenosis of the prostate. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 11: 363-366.
  91. Gagucas R J, Brown R W, Wheeler T M. Verumontanum mucosal gland hyperplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19: 30-36.
  92. Gikas E Del Buono E A, Epstein J I. Florid hyperplasia of mesonephric remnants involving prostate and periprostatic tissue: possible confusion with adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16: 454459 .