|
References
Click
Here for Article: Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Patient History: The patient is a 55-year old white male
with a history of diabetes, primary biliary cirrhosis, and prostate
cancer. (1)
He has a history of vasectomy and is taking glipizide, methotrexate,
colchicine, and ursodiol. The patient runs his own computer data
management company and is married. (2)
The patient had a biopsy one year earlier that was negative.
When his PSA rose to 6.6 ng/m, he was re-biopsied and found to
have two cores with Gleason 6 adenocarcinoma on the right. The
physical exam had been benign, i.e. clinical stage T1c.
After numerous discussions, including a thorough review of the
situation with his hepatologist about primary biliary cirrhosis
and anesthesia and surgical risk, the patient chose a laparoscopic
radical prostatectomy. (3,4)
The pre-operative labs were fine with the exception of mildly
elevated liver function tests. He had received a mechanical bowel
prep the day before surgery and was premedicated with antibiotics
and LMW heparin.
The patient was perfectly stable through anesthesia, the blood
loss was 200 cc., and his post-operative hematocrit was 38. The
specimen came out anatomically correct and I was able to spare
the neurovascular bundle on his left.
The pathologic examination showed a 42-gram specimen with a Gleason
6 adenocarcinoma that did not involve the seminal vesicles, bladder
neck, or urethral margin; the surgical margins and capsule were
free of tumor. Given this pathology report and based primarily
on one of our studies, I would estimate the patient's 10-year
disease-specific survival probability at more than 97%. (5)
The patient left the operating room with Band-Aid dots for dressings.
He began to drink clear liquids within 2 hours of anesthesia and
was sitting in a chair eating crackers and drinking juice within
5 hours of anesthesia. On being asked about pain, he replied that
he felt like he had pulled a muscle in his abdomen. He got no
analgesia after surgery and was discharged home with a Foley catheter
16 hours after surgery ended.
The patient resumed contact with his clients and was doing some
computer work at home one day after discharge. I had placed no
physical restrictions on him and, in less than 4 days after his
radical prostatectomy, he was out shopping for a car.
The Foley catheter was removed 10 days post-op and he received
Septra DS for 3 days and some Urimax to reduce urethral irritation.
According to our phone conversations since then, he has been having
erections and is continent. It sounds like he is actively pursuing
his usual business. A serum PSA drawn at your office May 24, 2000
was <0.1 ng/mL.
1. Krongrad A, Lai H, Lai S: Competing risks of mortality in
prostate cancer. J Urol 158:865-868, 1997.
2. Krongrad A, Lai H, Burke MA, Goodkin K, Lai S: Marriage and
mortality in prostate cancer. J Urol 156:1696-1700, 1996
3. Krongrad A: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol
Rep 1:37-41, 2000
4. Guillonneau B, Krongrad A, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical
prostatectomy: a technical manual. Private publication. 2000
5. Krongrad A, Lai H, Lai S: Survival after radical prostatectomy.
JAMA 278:44-46, 1997
|